3.9 Article

The campfire stories of Russell Marker, a pioneer of chemistry

出版社

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rsnr.2023.0022

关键词

history of chemistry; pharmaceutical industry; steroids; stereochemistry; octane rating; Russell Earl Marker; Mexico; Hungary

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The maverick American chemist Russell Earl Marker is famous for his research in the fragmentation of organic mercury compounds, the establishment of the octane number concept, the investigation of hydrocarbon rearrangements, and the exploration of the relationship between optical rotation and the configuration of organic compounds. His greatest achievement lies in the development of important isolation and synthesis methods for natural products, which laid the foundation for a new industry based on pharmaceutical chemistry of steroids. His unconventional life demonstrates that obstacles in scientific and technological progress can be overcome by serendipity, insight, and dedication. However, his premature retirement serves as a warning that even the toughest scientist's perseverance can waver if conditions worsen.
The maverick American chemist Russell Earl Marker (1902-1995) is known for his studies on the fragmentation of organic mercury compounds, establishing the concept of the octane number, investigating the rearrangements of hydrocarbons and exploring the relationship between optical rotation and the configuration of organic compounds. His greatest achievement, however, is the elaboration of seminal isolation and synthetic methods of an important class of natural products that helped found a new industry, based on the pharmaceutical chemistry of steroids. The nomadic life of this extraordinary man demonstrates that the enormous obstacles thwarting the progress of science and technology can be surmounted by serendipity, acumen and devotion. However, his premature retirement from chemistry is a warning sign that every scientist is vulnerable and even the toughest man's perseverance can fade if the conditions worsen.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.9
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据