4.5 Article

Boundedness of solutions in a predator-prey system with density-dependent motilities and indirect pursuit-evasion interaction

期刊

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nonrwa.2022.103797

关键词

Predator-prey model; Boundedness; Density-dependent diffusion; Attraction-repulsion; Indirect prey-taxis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the predator-prey system with density-dependent motilities and indirect pursuit-evasion interaction. Under certain assumptions, the global existence and boundedness of classical solutions are proven in two dimensions, and it is also shown that the global solutions are uniformly bounded with respect to time in higher dimensions.
This paper is concerned with the predator prey system with density-dependent motilities and indirect pursuit evasion interaction {u(t) = Delta(d(1)(w)u) + u(lambda - u av), x is an element of Omega, t > 0, v(t) = Delta(d(2)(z)v) + v(mu - v - bu), x is an element of Omega, t > 0, 0 = Delta w - w + v, x is an element of Omega, t > 0, 0 = Delta z - z + u, x is an element of Omega, t > 0 in a smooth bounded domain Omega subset of R-n (n >= 1) with homogeneous Neumann boundary conditions, where the parameters lambda, mu, a and b are positive constants. The global existence and the boundedness of the classical solution are established in two dimensions if the motility functions d(1) (w) and d(2) (z) satisfy the following hypotheses d(1) (w) is an element of C-3 ([0, infinity)), d(1) (w) > 0, d(1)'(w) < 0 for all w >= 0, d(2) (z) is an element of C-3 ([0, infinity)), d(2) (z) > 0, d(2)'(z) > 0 and d(2)'(z) is bounded for all z >= 0. However, further assume that the motility function d(2) (z) fulfills more rigorous conditions d(2)(z) is an element of C-3 ([0, infinity)), 0 < d(2)(z) < eta, d(2)'(z) > 0 and d(2)''(z) < 0 for all z >= 0 with eta > 0. It was also proved that the global solutions are uniformly bounded with respect to time in higher dimensions. (C) 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据