4.5 Article

The impact of hydrogen on mechanical performance of carbon alloy plates detected by eddy current method

期刊

NONDESTRUCTIVE TESTING AND EVALUATION
卷 38, 期 4, 页码 683-699

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/10589759.2023.2195647

关键词

Hydrogen damage; hydrogen embrittlement; eddy current testing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this paper, a characterization method for the degradation degree of hydrogen-induced properties of materials based on eddy current response signal is proposed. An improved hydrogen diffusion and distribution analysis model was established, and an early hydrogen damage eddy current detection model for multilayer conductive structure materials was constructed. The relationship between the eddy current response signal and hydrogen embrittlement performance index is established.
Hydrogen diffuses in the material and accumulates in dislocations, holes, etc. which will lead to deterioration of the mechanical properties of the material and affect the health state of the structural parts of hydrogen service. In this paper, a characterisation method for the degradation degree of hydrogen-induced properties of materials based on eddy current response signal is proposed. Based on the semi-infinite planar source diffusion model and hydrogen permeation model, an improved hydrogen diffusion and distribution analysis model was established, and an early hydrogen damage eddy current detection model for multilayer conductive structure materials was constructed. The evolution of material properties under the action of hydrogen was analysed, and a linear relationship between hydrogen content and conductivity was obtained. The loss of elongation was selected as the damage index and the relationship between the eddy current response signal and hydrogen embrittlement performance index is established. Experiments verify that the eddy current response signal is sensitive to the performance index and increases with the intensification of hydrogen-induced performance degradation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据