4.6 Review

Beyond knockouts: fine-tuning regulation of gene expression in plants with CRISPR-Cas-based promoter editing

期刊

NEW PHYTOLOGIST
卷 239, 期 3, 页码 868-874

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/nph.19020

关键词

cis-regulatory element; CRISPR-Cas; functional genomics; gene expression regulation; molecular breeding; noncoding sequences; plant genome editing; promoter editing

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The use of CRISPR-Cas genome editing technology in plant research is rapidly expanding, particularly in the field of editing plant promoters. However, there are significant limitations in using CRISPR-Cas9 to edit noncoding sequences like promoters, which have unique structures and regulatory mechanisms. Researchers urgently need efficient editing tools and strategies to overcome these obstacles and achieve precise target gene expression regulation. This article provides insights and references for implementing promoter editing-based research in plants.
The CRISPR-Cas-based genome editing field in plants is expanding rapidly. Editing plant promoters to obtain cis-regulatory alleles with altered expression levels or patterns of target genes is a highly promising topic. However, primarily used CRISPR-Cas9 has significant limitations when editing noncoding sequences like promoters, which have unique structures and regulatory mechanisms, including A-T richness, repetitive redundancy, difficulty in identifying key regulatory regions, and a higher frequency of DNA structure, epigenetic modification, and protein binding accessibility issues. Researchers urgently require efficient and feasible editing tools and strategies to address these obstacles, enhance promoter editing efficiency, increase diversity in promoter polymorphism, and, most importantly, enable 'non-silent' editing events that achieve precise target gene expression regulation. This article provides insights into the key challenges and references for implementing promoter editing-based research in plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据