4.3 Article

Multimodal 3D Mouse Brain Atlas Framework with the Skull-Derived Coordinate System

期刊

NEUROINFORMATICS
卷 21, 期 2, 页码 269-286

出版社

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12021-023-09623-9

关键词

Light sheet fluorescence microscopy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Brain atlas; Whole brain imaging; Multimodal imaging; Crossmodal registration

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) are technologies that allow non-invasive imaging of whole mouse brains in three dimensions. This study developed a bidirectional multimodal atlas framework to facilitate the translation of LSFM recorded brains to non-distorted templates, improving research on neuroscience, disease progression, and drug efficacy.
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and light-sheet fluorescence microscopy (LSFM) are technologies that enable non-disruptive 3-dimensional imaging of whole mouse brains. A combination of complementary information from both modalities is desirable for studying neuroscience in general, disease progression and drug efficacy. Although both technologies rely on atlas mapping for quantitative analyses, the translation of LSFM recorded data to MRI templates has been complicated by the morphological changes inflicted by tissue clearing and the enormous size of the raw data sets. Consequently, there is an unmet need for tools that will facilitate fast and accurate translation of LSFM recorded brains to in vivo, non-distorted templates. In this study, we have developed a bidirectional multimodal atlas framework that includes brain templates based on both imaging modalities, region delineations from the Allen's Common Coordinate Framework, and a skull-derived stereotaxic coordinate system. The framework also provides algorithms for bidirectional transformation of results obtained using either MR or LSFM (iDISCO cleared) mouse brain imaging while the coordinate system enables users to easily assign in vivo coordinates across the different brain templates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据