4.6 Article

Flow-based intrusion detection on software-defined networks: a multivariate time series anomaly detection approach

期刊

NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS
卷 35, 期 16, 页码 12175-12193

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00521-023-08376-5

关键词

Intrusion detection; Anomaly detection; Deep learning; Semi-supervised learning; Software-defined networks; Time series anomaly detection

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, we propose and implement the SAnDet architecture, an anomaly-based intrusion detection system using SDN. We utilize replicator neural networks (RNN) and the LSTM-based encoder-decoder (EncDecAD) method to identify unknown attacks. Experimental results show that EncDecAD outperforms RNN and our approach offers several benefits.
In this study, we present and implement the SAnDet (SDN anomaly detector) architecture, an anomaly-based intrusion detection system designed to take advantage of the capabilities offered by software-defined networking (SDN) architecture, as a controller application. The SAnDet system is composed of three modules: statistics collection, anomaly detection, and anomaly prevention. In particular, we utilize replicator neural networks (RNN), which is a specialized variant of the autoencoder, and the LSTM-based encoder-decoder (EncDecAD) method, which is a special type of long short-term memory (LSTM) network that has demonstrated a strong performance on data series particularly, to identify unknown attacks using flow features collected from OpenFlow switches. In our experiments, we utilize flow-based features extracted from network traffic data containing various types of attacks as input to our models in the form of time series. We evaluate the performance of our methods using the accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) metrics. Our experimental results demonstrate that EncDecAD outperforms RNN and that our approach offers several benefits over previously conducted research.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据