4.5 Article

Mechanism of RecF-RecO-RecR cooperation in bacterial homologous recombination

期刊

NATURE STRUCTURAL & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 30, 期 5, 页码 650-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-00967-z

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the authors investigate the cooperation mechanism of RecFOR proteins in bacteria using Thermus thermophilus proteins. Cryo-electron microscopy structures of the RecF-dsDNA complex and the interaction between RecF and the tetrameric RecR ring are presented. Lower-resolution reconstructions of the RecR-RecO subcomplex and the RecFOR-DNA assembly are also provided. These results shed light on the biochemical data available for the RecFOR system.
In bacteria, one type of homologous-recombination-based DNA-repair pathway involves RecFOR proteins that bind at the junction between single-stranded (ss) and double-stranded (ds) DNA. They facilitate the replacement of SSB protein, which initially covers ssDNA, with RecA, which mediates the search for homologous sequences. However, the molecular mechanism of RecFOR cooperation remains largely unknown. We used Thermus thermophilus proteins to study this system. Here, we present a cryo-electron microscopy structure of the RecF-dsDNA complex, and another reconstruction that shows how RecF interacts with two different regions of the tetrameric RecR ring. Lower-resolution reconstructions of the RecR-RecO subcomplex and the RecFOR-DNA assembly explain how RecO is positioned to interact with ssDNA and SSB, which is proposed to lock the complex on a ssDNA-dsDNA junction. Our results integrate the biochemical data available for the RecFOR system and provide a framework for its complete understanding. Using cryo-EM, the authors study the RecF-DNA, RecFR-DNA, RecOR-DNA and RecFOR-DNA complexes. Combining the information from these structures, they provide new insight in how the RecFOR proteins cooperate to recognize ss-ds junctions and promote bacterial recombination.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据