4.8 Article

Floatable photocatalytic hydrogel nanocomposites for large-scale solar hydrogen production

期刊

NATURE NANOTECHNOLOGY
卷 18, 期 7, 页码 754-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41565-023-01385-4

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A floatable photocatalytic platform consisting of porous elastomer-hydrogel nanocomposites is designed to address the challenges of solar energy and mass transfer, catalyst instability, and reverse reactions. It achieves efficient hydrogen evolution and demonstrates potential for commercialization in seawater and highly turbid water.
Storing solar energy in chemical bonds aided by heterogeneous photocatalysis is desirable for sustainable energy conversion. Despite recent progress in designing highly active photocatalysts, inefficient solar energy and mass transfer, the instability of catalysts and reverse reactions impede their practical large-scale applications. Here we tackle these challenges by designing a floatable photocatalytic platform constructed from porous elastomer-hydrogel nanocomposites. The nanocomposites at the air-water interface feature efficient light delivery, facile supply of water and instantaneous gas separation. Consequently, a high hydrogen evolution rate of 163 mmol h(-1) m(-2) can be achieved using Pt/TiO2 cryoaerogel, even without forced convection. When fabricated in an area of 1 m(2) and incorporated with economically feasible single-atom Cu/TiO2 photocatalysts, the nanocomposites produce 79.2 ml of hydrogen per day under natural sunlight. Furthermore, long-term stable hydrogen production in seawater and highly turbid water and photoreforming of polyethylene terephthalate demonstrate the potential of the nanocomposites as a commercially viable photocatalytic system. Floatable hydrogel nanocomposites, with facile intercalation of various photocatalysts, effectively produce hydrogen. The easily scalable nature of the nanocomposites demonstrates the practical application of this new type of photocatalytic platform.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据