4.8 Article

Spontaneously established syntrophic yeast communities improve bioproduction

期刊

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 8, 页码 951-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-023-01341-2

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, by systematically testing pairwise combinations of auxotrophic Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants, we identified 49 pairs that spontaneously form syntrophic, synergistic communities. We characterized the stability and growth dynamics of nine cocultures and demonstrated that a pair of tryptophan auxotrophs grow by exchanging a pathway intermediate rather than end products. Additionally, we introduced a malonic semialdehyde biosynthesis pathway split between different pairs of auxotrophs, resulting in increased production. Our findings highlight the potential of nutritional codependence to improve biotechnological processes.
Nutritional codependence (syntrophy) has underexplored potential to improve biotechnological processes by using cooperating cell types. So far, design of yeast syntrophic communities has required extensive genetic manipulation, as the co-inoculation of most eukaryotic microbial auxotrophs does not result in cooperative growth. Here we employ high-throughput phenotypic screening to systematically test pairwise combinations of auxotrophic Saccharomyces cerevisiae deletion mutants. Although most coculture pairs do not enter syntrophic growth, we identify 49 pairs that spontaneously form syntrophic, synergistic communities. We characterized the stability and growth dynamics of nine cocultures and demonstrated that a pair of tryptophan auxotrophs grow by exchanging a pathway intermediate rather than end products. We then introduced a malonic semialdehyde biosynthesis pathway split between different pairs of auxotrophs, which resulted in increased production. Our results report the spontaneous formation of stable syntrophy in S. cerevisiae auxotrophs and illustrate t he biotech no logical potential of dividing labor in a cooperating intraspecies community.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据