4.8 Article

Correlative metabologenomics of 110 fungi reveals metabolite-gene cluster pairs

期刊

NATURE CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 19, 期 7, 页码 846-+

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41589-023-01276-8

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Natural products research increasingly applies -omics technologies to guide molecular discovery. While the combined analysis of genomic and metabolomic datasets has proved valuable for identifying natural products and their biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in bacteria, this integrated approach lacks application to fungi. The creation of a linked genomics-metabolomics dataset for 110 Ascomycetes and the optimization of gene cluster family (GCF) networking parameters and correlation-based scoring allowed for pairing fungal natural products with their BGCs. The platform identified associations between various natural products and validated BGCs, uncovering new pathways for future discovery.
Natural products research increasingly applies -omics technologies to guide molecular discovery. While the combined analysis of genomic and metabolomic datasets has proved valuable for identifying natural products and their biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in bacteria, this integrated approach lacks application to fungi. Because fungi are hyper-diverse and underexplored for new chemistry and bioactivities, we created a linked genomics-metabolomics dataset for 110 Ascomycetes, and optimized both gene cluster family (GCF) networking parameters and correlation-based scoring for pairing fungal natural products with their BGCs. Using a network of 3,007 GCFs (organized from 7,020 BGCs), we examined 25 known natural products originating from 16 known BGCs and observed statistically significant associations between 21 of these compounds and their validated BGCs. Furthermore, the scalable platform identified the BGC for the pestalamides, demystifying its biogenesis, and revealed more than 200 high-scoring natural product-GCF linkages to direct future discovery.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据