4.6 Article

The Effects of Cognitive Control and Time on Frontal Beta Oscillations

期刊

CEREBRAL CORTEX
卷 26, 期 4, 页码 1715-1732

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv006

关键词

cognitive control; effort; monkey; reward; time-on-task

资金

  1. Fondation de France
  2. Agence National de la Recherche
  3. Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale
  4. Fondation Caisse d'Epargne Rhone Alpes Lyon
  5. Fondation Neurodis
  6. labex CORTEX [ANR-11-LABX-0042]
  7. Marie Curie Intra-European Fellowship [PIEF-GA-2010-273790]
  8. Ministere de l'enseignement et de la recherche
  9. LOEWE - NeFF project (Neuronale Koordination Forschungsschwerpunkt)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Frontal beta oscillations are associated with top-down control mechanisms but also change over time during a task. It is unclear whether change over time represents another control function or a neural instantiation of vigilance decrements over time, the time-on-task effect. We investigated how frontal beta oscillations are modulated by cognitive control and time. We used frontal chronic electrocorticography in monkeys performing a trial-and-error task, comprising search and repetition phases. Specific beta oscillations in the delay period of each trial were modulated by task phase and adaptation to feedback. Beta oscillations in this same period showed a significant within-session change. These separate modulations of beta oscillations did not interact. Crucially, and in contrast to previous investigations, we examined modulations of beta around spontaneous pauses in work. After pauses, the beta power modulation was reset and the cognitive control effect was maintained. Cognitive performance was also maintained whereas behavioral signs of fatigue continued to increase. We propose that these beta oscillations reflect multiple factors contributing to the regulation of cognitive control. Due to the effect of pauses, the time-sensitive factor cannot be a neural correlate of time-on-task but may reflect attentional effort.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据