4.8 Article

RHOJ controls EMT-associated resistance to chemotherapy

期刊

NATURE
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-023-05838-7

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals that cancer cells undergoing EMT are highly resistant to various anti-cancer therapies. RHOJ, a small GTPase preferentially expressed in EMT cancer cells, controls resistance to therapy by enhancing the response to replicative stress and activating the DNA-damage response. RHOJ interacts with proteins that regulate nuclear actin, and inhibition of actin polymerization sensitizes EMT tumor cells to chemotherapy-induced cell death in a RHOJ-dependent manner.
The resistance of cancer cells to therapy is responsible for the death of most patients with cancer(1). Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been associated with resistance to therapy in different cancer cells(2,3). However, the mechanisms by which EMT mediates resistance to therapy remain poorly understood. Here, using a mouse model of skin squamous cell carcinoma undergoing spontaneous EMT during tumorigenesis, we found that EMT tumour cells are highly resistant to a wide range of anti-cancer therapies both in vivo and in vitro. Using gain and loss of function studies in vitro and in vivo, we found that RHOJ-a small GTPase that is preferentially expressed in EMT cancer cells-controls resistance to therapy. Using genome-wide transcriptomic and proteomic profiling, we found that RHOJ regulates EMT-associated resistance to chemotherapy by enhancing the response to replicative stress and activating the DNA-damage response, enabling tumour cells to rapidly repair DNA lesions induced by chemotherapy. RHOJ interacts with proteins that regulate nuclear actin, and inhibition of actin polymerization sensitizes EMT tumour cells to chemotherapy-induced cell death in a RHOJ-dependent manner. Together, our study uncovers the role and the mechanisms through which RHOJ acts as a key regulator of EMT-associated resistance to chemotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据