4.8 Review

Engineered drug delivery nanosystems for tumor microenvironment normalization therapy

期刊

NANO TODAY
卷 49, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.nantod.2023.101766

关键词

Engineered drug delivery nanosystems; Normalization of tumor microenvironment; Regulation strategies; Tumor microenvironment; Tumor therapy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in tumor occurrence, development, and metastasis. Reprogramming TME is a potential therapeutic target for effective tumor damage. Nanobiomaterials have been extensively integrated into the construction of engineered drug delivery nanosystems for TME normalization therapy.
As a complex soil ecosystem, the tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a crucial role in the occurrence, development and metastasis of tumors. Reprogramming TME can block the interactive network between tumors and extracellular matrix (ECM) / various surrounding cells and contribute to tumor effective da-mage, which is a potential therapeutic target in oncotherapy. Nanobiomaterials have received more at-tention due to their excellent drug loading and easy functionalization properties, which have been extensively integrated into the construction of engineered drug delivery nanosystems for TME normal-ization therapy. It has become a commanding point in the field of anti-tumor therapy. This review intends to present and analyze advanced nanotechnology strategies for normalizing TME from 7 different aspects including the reprogramming of extracellular matrix (ECM), cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), abnormal blood vasculatures, hypoxia, tumor acidosis, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and tumor immune tolerance microenvironment based on the various engineered drug delivery nanosystems. It also discusses the currently existing problems and future development trends, which are expected to be helpful for the translational application of nanomedicine in clinical cancer therapy. (c) 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据