4.5 Review

Candida spp. in Human Intestinal Health and Disease: More than a Gut Feeling

期刊

MYCOPATHOLOGIA
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11046-023-00743-z

关键词

Inflammation; Mycobiome; Microbiome; Preterm; Colonization; Strain diversity

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fungi play a crucial role in the intestinal microbiota, despite their low abundance. The presence of Candida, a genus of fungi, has been linked to intestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease. Studies have utilized culture-dependent and genomic techniques to understand the role of Candida in intestinal colonization and disease development. However, challenges in both biology and technology may hinder a complete understanding of host-microbe interactions.
Fungi are an essential part of the normal collection of intestinal microorganisms, even though their collective abundance comprises only 0.1-1% of all fecal microbes. The composition and role of the fungal population is often studied in relation to early-life microbial colonization and development of the (mucosal) immune system. The genus Candida is frequently described as one of the most abundant genera, and altered fungal compositions (including elevated abundance of Candida spp.) have been linked with intestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease and irritable bowel syndrome. These studies are performed using both culture-dependent and genomic (metabarcoding) techniques. In this review, we aimed to summarize existing data on intestinal Candida spp. colonization in relation to intestinal disease and provide a brief overview of the biological and technical challenges in this field, including the recently described role of sub-species strain variation of intestinal Candida albicans. Together, the evidence for a contributing role of Candida spp. in pediatric and adult intestinal disease is quickly expanding, even though technical and biological challenges may limit full understanding of host-microbe interactions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据