4.6 Article

An efficient image segmentation method based on expectation maximization and Salp swarm algorithm

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-15149-8

关键词

Image segmentation; Multilevel thresholding; Expectation maximization; Salp swarm algorithm; Artificial intelligence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a novel thresholding approach that combines EM and SSA to overcome the weaknesses of the EM algorithm. It also introduces a mechanism to maintain the desired number of clusters. Experimental results show that the proposed method outperforms traditional EM algorithm and other state-of-the-art methods in terms of segmentation performance.
Multilevel image thresholding using Expectation Maximization (EM) is an efficient method for image segmentation. However, it has two weaknesses: 1) EM is a greedy algorithm and cannot jump out of local optima. 2) it cannot guarantee the number of required classes while estimating the histogram by Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM). in this paper, to overcome these shortages, a novel thresholding approach by combining EM and Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA) is developed. SSA suggests potential points to the EM algorithm to fly to a better position. Moreover, a new mechanism is considered to maintain the number of desired clusters. Twenty-four medical test images are selected and examined by standard metrics such as PSNR and FSIM. The proposed method is compared with the traditional EM algorithm, and an average improvement of 5.27% in PSNR values and 2.01% in FSIM values were recorded. Also, the proposed approach is compared with four existing segmentation techniques by using CT scan images that Qatar University has collected. Experimental results depict that the proposed method obtains the first rank in terms of PSNR and the second rank in terms of FSIM. It has been observed that the proposed technique performs better performance in the segmentation result compared to other considered state-of-the-art methods.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据