4.6 Article

Web pages from mockup design based on convolutional neural network and class activation mapping

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-15108-3

关键词

Web-design; Convolutional neural networks; Object detection; Semantic segmentation; User eXperience

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The objective of this study is to validate the use of deep neural networks (DNNs) for segmenting and classifying web elements. A dataset of 2200 images representing 10 distinct classes was created using screenshots of real web pages. The study contributes by validating classification-only convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with the support of Class Activation Mapping (CAM), a weakly-supervised semantic segmentation technique. The best-performing model achieved a final accuracy rating of 95.71%, but improvements are still needed on the dataset and architecture for real-time dynamic web page building.
The objective of this study is to validate the use of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to segment and classify web elements. To achieve this, a dataset of 2200 images was created through screenshots of real web pages, with 10 distinct classes to represent the most common web elements. The contributions of this study encompass the validation of classification-only Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) with the support of Class Activation Mapping (CAM), a weakly-supervised semantic segmentation technique that requires no in-image annotation, significantly simplifying the dataset creation process when compared to traditional segmentation models. Multiple networks with distinct hyper-parameter combinations were cross-validated with 10 folds, with a final accuracy rating of 95.71% on the best-performing model. Although the final CNN showed promising results, further improvements on the dataset and architecture are still required for it to be employed as the centerpiece of a real-time dynamic web page building solution, with clear improvements needed on the clarity of the segmentation heatmap.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据