4.6 Article

Multi-scale motivated neural network for image-text matching

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11042-023-15321-0

关键词

Image-text matching; Multi-scale information; Cross-modal interaction; Matching score fusion algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a Multi-Scale Motivated Neural Network (MSMNN) model for image-text matching. The model extracts visual and textual features from three scales and utilizes a cross-modal interaction module to discover the potential relationship between image-text pairs. Furthermore, a matching score fusion algorithm is proposed to fuse matching results from three different levels. Extensive experiments show the effectiveness of the method, achieving competitive results on two well-known datasets.
Existing mainstream image-text matching methods usually measure the relevance of image-text pairs by capturing and aggregating the affinities between textual words and visual regions, while failing to consider the single-scale matching bias caused by the imbalance of image and text information. In this paper, we design a Multi-Scale Motivated Neural Network (MSMNN) model for image-text matching. In contrast to previous single-scale methods, MSMNN encourages neural networks to extract visual and textual features from three scales, including local features, global features and salient features, which can take full advantage of the complementarity of multi-scale matching to reduce the bias of single-scale matching. Also, we propose a cross-modal interaction module to realize the fusion of visual and textual features in local alignment, so as to discover the potential relationship between image-text pairs. Furthermore, we also propose a matching score fusion algorithm to fuse matching results from three different levels, which can be freely applied to other initial image-text matching results with a negligible overhead. Extensive experiments validate the effectiveness of our method, and the performance has achieved fairly competitive results on two well-known datasets, Flickr30K and MSCOCO, with a boost of 1.04% and 0.59% on evaluation metric mR compared with the advanced method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据