4.7 Article

Neutron-capture elements in NGC 6752 multiple populations

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stad486

关键词

stars: abundances; stars: Population II; Galaxy: globular clusters: general; Galaxy: globular clusters: individual (NGC6752)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Globular clusters have been extensively studied for their light element variations, but the source of pollution is still debated. This study analyzes heavy elements and their relation to light ones to explore the contribution of different stellar masses to cluster pollution. The results show no clear relations between light s-process elements (Y ii) or heavy elements (Ba ii) with light elements (Li, Na, or Al), suggesting that the polluter(s) responsible for Na (Al) or Li production do not produce significant amounts of Y ii and Ba ii. Models also exclude a significant contribution from AGB stars with masses lower than 5 M-circle dot, and a possible CH star is found in the sample.
Globular clusters have been widely studied in terms of light element variations present in their different stellar populations. However, the nature of the polluter(s) responsible for this phenomenon is still debated. The study of heavy elements and their relation to light ones can provide further constraints. In particular, we aim to explore the possible contribution of asymptotic giant branch stars of different stellar masses to the internal pollution in the cluster. We derive abundances of elements from different nucleosynthetic chains, such as Na, Mg, Ca, Sc, Cu, Y, and Ba. We did not find clear relations between the light s-process elements (represented by Y ii) or heavy ones (represented by Ba ii) with light elements (Li, Na, or Al). This indicates that the polluter(s) responsible for the Na (Al) or Li production does not produce large amounts of Y ii and Ba ii. Furthermore, the comparison with models discards a possible significant contribution to the cluster pollution from AGB stars with masses lower than 5 M-circle dot. In addition, we found a potential CH star in our sample.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据