4.6 Article

Chemical Composition and In Vitro Antioxidant Activity and Anti-Acetylcholinesterase Activity of Essential Oils from Tadehagi triquetrum (L.) Ohashi

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062734

关键词

Tadehagi triquetrum (L; ) ohashi; essential oils; chemical composition; antioxidant activity; anticholinesterase activity; GC-MS; GC-FID

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present study determined the chemical compositions of essential oils from Tadehagi triquetrum and evaluated their antioxidant and anti-cholinesterase activity. A total of 58 organic compounds were identified in the essential oils. The major components were palmitic acid, 1-Octen-3-ol, Caryophyllene, (Z)-18-Octadec-9-enolide, and 3-Hexen-1-ol. The essential oils showed moderate antioxidant and anti-acetylcholinesterase activity.
The present study aimed to determine the chemical compositions of essential oils (EOs) from Tadehagi triquetrum (L.) Ohashi and evaluate their antioxidant and anti-cholinesterase activity under the comprehensive influence of chemical components. The essential oils were extracted from T. triquetrum (L.) Ohashi by hydrodistillation. A total of 58 organic compounds were identified by GC-FID and GC-MS analysis. The major components of T. triquetrum (L.) Ohashi EOs were identified as palmitic acid (22.46%), 1-Octen-3-ol (14.07%), Caryophyllene (7.20%), (Z)-18-Octadec-9-enolide (6.04%), and 3-Hexen-1-ol (4.55%). The antioxidant activity of the essential oils was determined by using ABTS assay, DPPH assay, and FRAP assay, with IC50 values of 2.12 +/- 0.05 mg/mL, 4.73 +/- 0.91 mg/mL against the ABTS, DPPH, and FRAP value 117.42 +/- 8.10 mM/g. The result showed that it had moderate antioxidant activities in the experiment, which why it is likely that it will be used as an antioxidant. At the same time, the EOs also showed moderate anti-acetylcholinesterase activity. This study expands the chemical and biological knowledge of the EOs of T. triquetrum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据