4.6 Article

Simulation Study on Molecular Adsorption of Coal in Chicheng Coal Mine

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28083302

关键词

coalbed methane; coal macromolecular structure model; molecular simulation; adsorption properties; microscopic mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In order to understand the importance of methane and carbon dioxide adsorption mechanisms in coal for coalbed methane development, we aimed to investigate the influence of factors such as adsorption pressure, temperature, gas properties, and water content on gas adsorption behavior at the molecular level. Using molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (GCMC) methods, we simulated and analyzed different pressure, temperature, and water content conditions using a nonsticky coal sample from Chicheng Coal Mine. Our study established a theoretical foundation for understanding the adsorption characteristics of coalbed methane in coal and provided technical support for improving coalbed methane extraction.
To study the importance of the adsorption mechanism of methane (CH4) and carbon dioxide (CO2) in coal for coalbed methane development, we aimed to reveal the influence mechanism of adsorption pressure, temperature, gas properties, water content, and other factors on gas molecular adsorption behavior from the molecular level. In this study, we selected the nonsticky coal in Chicheng Coal Mine as the research object. Based on the coal macromolecular model, we used the molecular dynamics (MD) and Monte Carlo (GCMC) methods to simulate and analyze the conditions of different pressure, temperature, and water content. The change rule and microscopic mechanism of the adsorption amount, equal adsorption heat, and interaction energy of CO2 and CH4 gas molecules in the coal macromolecular structure model establish a theoretical foundation for revealing the adsorption characteristics of coalbed methane in coal and provide technical support for further improving coalbed methane extraction.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据