4.6 Article

Protective Effect of Castanopsis sieboldii Extract against UVB-Induced Photodamage in Keratinocytes

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062842

关键词

Castanopsis sieboldii; UVB; keratinocyte; autophagy; ER stress

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The ethanol extract of Castanopsis sieboldii leaf (CSL3) has a protective effect against UVB-induced skin damage by restoring cell viability, reducing reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and promoting collagen accumulation and cell migration. The major component of CSL3, epigallocatechin gallate, improves cell viability through regulation of ER stress and autophagy.
Ultraviolet B (UVB) rays disrupt the skin by causing photodamage via processes such as reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, DNA damage, and/or collagen degradation. Castanopsis sieboldii is an evergreen tree native to the southern Korean peninsula. Although it is known to have antioxidant and anti-inflammatory effects, its protective effect against photodamage in keratinocytes has not been investigated. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the effect of 70% ethanol extract of C. sieboldii leaf (CSL3) on UVB-mediated skin injuries and elucidated the underlying molecular mechanisms. CSL3 treatment restored the cell viability decreased by UVB irradiation. Moreover, CSL3 significantly inhibited UVB- or tert-butyl hydroperoxide-mediated ROS generation in HaCaT cells. ER stress was inhibited, whereas autophagy was upregulated by CSL3 treatment against UVB irradiation. Additionally, CSL3 increased collagen accumulation and cell migration, which were decreased by UVB exposure. Notably, epigallocatechin gallate, the major component of CSL3, improved the cell viability decreased by UVB irradiation through regulation of ER stress and autophagy. Conclusively, CSL3 may represent a promising therapeutic candidate for the treatment of UVB-induced skin damage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据