4.6 Article

Quantitation of Tissue Amyloid via Fluorescence Spectroscopy Using Controlled Concentrations of Thioflavin-S

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28114483

关键词

Thioflavin-S; fluorescence spectroscopy; amyloid; Alzheimer's disease

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, an optimized ThS staining protocol was developed for the sensitive detection of beta-amyloids in the widely used 5xFAD Alzheimer's mouse model. The findings demonstrate the efficacy of a controlled ThS staining protocol and highlight the potential use of ThS for the detection of protein misfolding that precedes clinical manifestation of disease.
Amyloids are misfolded proteins that aggregate into fibrillar structures, the accumulation of which is associated with the pathogenesis of many neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). Early, sensitive detection of these misfolded aggregates is of great interest to the field, as amyloid deposition begins well before the presentation of clinical symptoms. Thioflavin-S (ThS) is a fluorescent probe commonly used to detect amyloid pathology. Protocols for ThS staining vary, but they often use high staining concentrations followed by differentiation, which causes varying levels of non-specific staining and potentially leaves more subtle amyloid deposition unidentified. In this study, we developed an optimized ThS staining protocol for the sensitive detection of beta-myloids in the widely used 5xFAD Alzheimer's mouse model. Controlled dye concentrations together with fluorescence spectroscopy and advanced analytical methods enabled not only the visualization of plaque pathology, but also the detection of subtle and widespread protein misfolding throughout the 5xFAD white matter and greater parenchyma. Together, these findings demonstrate the efficacy of a controlled ThS staining protocol and highlight the potential use of ThS for the detection of protein misfolding that precedes clinical manifestation of disease.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据