4.6 Article

Do Rutin and Quercetin Retain Their Structure and Radical Scavenging Activity after Exposure to Radiation?

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062713

关键词

quercetin; rutin; electron beam irradiation; antioxidant; HPLC; EPR; FTIR

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of ionizing radiation on the physicochemical properties of quercetin and rutin in the solid state was investigated. The results showed that irradiation caused the formation of a small number of free radicals, but did not change the chemical structure or antioxidant properties of the tested flavonoids. Spectroscopic and chromatographic analyses confirmed the radiostability of quercetin and rutin.
The influence of ionizing radiation on the physicochemical properties of quercetin and rutin in the solid state was studied. Quercetin and rutin were irradiated with the standard recommended radiation dose (25 kGy) according to EN 522 standard. The samples were irradiated by electron beam radiation. EPR studies indicate the formation of a small number of free radicals due to irradiation. Moreover, some radicals recombined with the mean lifetime of 1200 and 93 h, and a stable radical concentration reached only 0.29 and 0.90 ppm for quercetin and rutin, respectively. The performed spectroscopic study (FT-IR) confirmed the radiostability of the flavonoids tested. Chromatographic tests (HPLC, HPLC-MS) showed that irradiation of quercetin and rutin with a 25 kGy dose did not change the physicochemical properties of the tested compounds. Degradation products were not observed. The antioxidant activities were determined by the 2,2-diphenyl-1-pycrylhydrazyl (DPPH) free radical scavenging activity assay, ABTS Radical Scavenging Assay (ABTS), Ferric Reducing Antioxidant Power Assay (FRAP), Cupric Ion Reducing Antioxidant Capacity Assay (CUPRAC). The conducted research confirmed that exposure to ionizing radiation does not change the chemical structure of tested flavonoids and their antioxidant properties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据