4.6 Article

Magnetic and Electronic Properties of Sr Doped Infinite-Layer NdNiO2 Supercell: A Screened Hybrid Density Functional Study

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28103999

关键词

Nd9-nSrnNi9O18 (n=0-2); magnetism; electronic structure; HSE06

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The influence of doping Sr atoms on the structural, magnetic, and electronic properties of NdSrNiO2 was studied. The results showed that the substitution of Sr decreased the magnetic moments and affected the orbital structure near the Fermi level. Sr atoms primarily interact weakly with O atoms and primarily contribute to building the infinite-layer structure of the material.
To understand the influence of doping Sr atoms on the structural, magnetic, and electronic properties of the infinite-layer NdSrNiO2, we carried out the screened hybrid density functional study on the Nd9-nSrnNi9O18 (n = 0-2) unit cells. Geometries, substitution energies, magnetic moments, spin densities, atom- and lm-projected partial density of states (PDOS), spin-polarized band structures, and the average Bader charges were studied. It showed that the total magnetic moments of the Nd9Ni9O18 and Nd8SrNi9O18 unit cells are 37.4 and 24.9 emu g(-1), respectively. They are decreased to 12.6 and 4.2 emu g(-1) for the Nd7Sr2Ni9O18-Dia and Nd7Sr2Ni9O18-Par unit cells. The spin density distributions demonstrated that magnetic disordering of the Ni atoms results in the magnetism decrease. The spin-polarized band structures indicated that the symmetry of the spin-up and spin-down energy bands around the Fermi levels also influence the total magnetic moments. Atom- and lm-projected PDOS as well as the band structures revealed that Ni(dx2-y2) is the main orbital intersecting the Fermi level. As a whole, electrons of Sr atoms tend to locate locally and hybridize weakly with the O atoms. They primarily help to build the infinite-layer structures, and influence the electronic structure near the Fermi level indirectly.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据