4.6 Article

Comparative Methods to Evaluate the Antioxidant Capacity of Propolis: An Attempt to Explain the Differences

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28124847

关键词

propolis; total phenolic compounds; antioxidant capacity; UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Propolis, a natural product produced by bees, contains a complex mixture of compounds that contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analyzed the pollen profile, phenolic compound content, antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. Different techniques were used to determine total phenolic content and antioxidant capacity, and the presence of specific compounds in propolis samples significantly impacted their antioxidant capacity and quantification of total phenolic content. The major compounds identified in the propolis samples were chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester. The study highlights the importance of method selection for determining phenolic content and antioxidant activity in propolis samples and the contribution of specific compounds to their quantification.
Propolis is a natural product produced by bees that contains a complex mixture of compounds, including phenolic compounds and flavonoids. These compounds contribute to its biological activities, such as antioxidant capacity. This study analysed the pollen profile, total phenolic content (TPC), antioxidant properties, and phenolic compound profile of four propolis samples from Portugal. The total phenolic compounds in the samples were determined by six different techniques: four different Folin-Ciocalteu (F-C) methods, spectrophotometry (SPECT), and voltammetry (SWV). Of the six methods, SPECT allowed the highest quantification, while SWV achieved the lowest. The mean TPC values for these methods were 422 & PLUSMN; 98 and 47 & PLUSMN; 11 mg GAE/g sample, respectively. Antioxidant capacity was determined by four different methods: DPPH, FRAP, original ferrocyanide (OFec), and modified ferrocyanide (MFec). The MFec method gave the highest antioxidant capacity for all samples, followed by the DPPH method. The study also investigated the correlation between TPC and antioxidant capacity with the presence of hydroxybenzoic acid (HBA), hydroxycinnamic acid (HCA), and flavonoids (FLAV) in propolis samples. The results showed that the concentrations of specific compounds in propolis samples can significantly impact their antioxidant capacity and TPC quantification. Analysis of the profile of phenolic compounds by the UHPLC-DAD-ESI-MS technique identified chrysin, caffeic acid isoprenyl ester, pinocembrin, galangin, pinobanksin-3-O-acetate, and caffeic acid phenyl ester as the major compounds in the four propolis samples. In conclusion, this study shows the importance of the choice of method for determining TPC and antioxidant activity in samples and the contribution of HBA and HCA content to their quantification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据