4.6 Article

Finite Element Modelling of a Gram-Negative Bacterial Cell and Nanospike Array for Cell Rupture Mechanism Study

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28052184

关键词

nanotexture; 3D finite volume model; gram-negative bacteria; cell-rupture mechanism

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inspired by nature, a study was conducted using a finite element model to investigate the interaction mechanism between bacterial cell membranes and nanospikes. Results showed that the deformation of the bacterial cell wall around the nanospike contact point led to cell rupture, similar to a paper punching machine. These findings provide insights into how specific bacterial cells are deformed and ruptured by nanospikes.
Inspired by nature, it is envisaged that a nanorough surface exhibits bactericidal properties by rupturing bacterial cells. In order to study the interaction mechanism between the cell membrane of a bacteria and a nanospike at the contact point, a finite element model was developed using the ABAQUS software package. The model, which saw a quarter of a gram-negative bacteria (Escherichia coli) cell membrane adhered to a 3 x 6 array of nanospikes, was validated by the published results, which show a reasonably good agreement with the model. The stress and strain development in the cell membrane was modeled and were observed to be spatially linear and temporally nonlinear. From the study, it was observed that the bacterial cell wall was deformed around the location of the nanospike tips as full contact was generated. Around the contact point, the principal stress reached above the critical stress leading to a creep deformation that is expected to cause cell rupture by penetrating the nanospike, and the mechanism is envisaged to be somewhat similar to that of a paper punching machine. The obtained results in this project can provide an insight on how bacterial cells of a specific species are deformed when they adhere to nanospikes, and how it is ruptured using this mechanism.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据