4.6 Article

Confined Silver Nanoparticles in Ionic Liquid Films

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28073029

关键词

ionic liquids; vapor deposition; thin films; microdroplets; silver nanoparticles

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study successfully synthesized silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and stabilized them in coalesced ionic liquid (IL) films with the help of sputter deposition and argon plasma. The formation and stabilization of AgNPs in IL films were confirmed using SEM and UV-Vis spectroscopy. Thicker IL films and [C(5)C(5)im][NTf2] IL in particular were found to be more favorable for the formation and stabilization of AgNPs.
This work reports the formation of silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) by sputter deposition in thin films of three different ionic liquids (ILs) with the same anion (bis(trifluoromethylsulfonyl)imide) and cation (imidazolium), but with different alkyl chain lengths and symmetries in the cationic moiety ([C(4)C(1)im][NTf2], [C(2)C(2)im][NTf2], and [C(5)C(5)im][NTf2]). Ionic liquid (IL) films in the form of microdroplets with different thicknesses (200 to 800 monolayers) were obtained through vacuum thermal evaporation onto glass substrates coated with indium tin oxide (ITO). The sputtering process of the Ag onto the ILs when conducted simultaneously with argon plasma promoted the coalescence of the ILs' droplets and the formation, incorporation, and stabilization of the metallic nanoparticles in the coalesced IL films. The formation/stabilization of the AgNPs in the IL films was confirmed using high-resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and UV-Vis spectroscopy. It was found that the IL films with larger thicknesses (600 and 800 monolayers) were better media for the formation of AgNPs. Among the ILs used, [C(5)C(5)im][NTf2] was found to be particularly promising for the stabilization of AgNPs. The use of larger IL droplets as capture media was found to promote a better stabilization of the AgNPs, thereby reducing their tendency to aggregate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据