4.6 Article

Improved Strength and Heat Distortion Temperature of Emi-Aromatic Polyamide 10T-co-1012 (PA10T/1012)/GO Composites via In Situ Polymerization

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28041960

关键词

in situ polymerization; semi-aromatic polyamide; GO; heat deformation temperature

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An effective method for preparing PA10T/1012/GO composites by pre-dispersion and one-step in situ polymerization was proposed. The interaction between PA10T/1012 grafted graphene sheets and its matrix forms a cross-linked network structure, enhancing the mechanical properties of the composites. Furthermore, the heat distortion temperature (HDT) of the composites is greatly increased due to the cross-linked network structure.
In this paper, an effective method for preparing poly (p-phenylene terephthalamide) -co- poly (dodecanedioyl) decylamine (PA10T/1012)/graphene oxide (GO) composites by pre-dispersion and one-step in situ polymerization was proposed for the first time. During the process of polycondensation, the condensation between the terminal amino groups of PA10T/1012 chains and the oxygen-containing functional groups of GO allowed nylon to be grafted onto graphene sheets. The effects of polymer grafting on the thermal and mechanical properties of (PA10T/1012)/GO composites were studied in detail. Due to the interaction between PA10T/1012 grafted graphene sheets and its matrix, GO is well dispersed in the PA10T/1012 matrix and physically entangled with it, forming a cross-linked network structure of polymer bridged graphene, thus obtaining enhanced tensile strength, tensile modulus and impact strength. More importantly, benefiting from the cross-linked network structure, the heat distortion temperature (HDT) of the composite is greatly increased from 77.3 degrees C to 144.2 degrees C. This in situ polycondensation method opens a new avenue to prepare polycondensate graphene-based composites with high strength and high heat distortion temperatures.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据