4.6 Article

Bioassay-Guided Alkaloids Isolation from Camellia sinensis and Colchicum luteum: In Silico and In Vitro Evaluations for Protease Inhibition

期刊

MOLECULES
卷 28, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28062459

关键词

bioactive compounds; medicinal chemistry; purification; docking studies; pharmaceutical assessment

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bioassay-guided isolation of colchicine and caffeine from Camellia sinensis and Colchicum luteum, respectively, using a protease assay model. Structural validation was carried out using spectral techniques. Optimization of the purified compounds was performed using Gaussian software. Several global reactivity characteristics were determined to explain the diverse behavior of the compounds.
Bioassay-guided isolation from Camellia sinensis (Theaceae) and Colchicum luteum (Liliaceae) utilizing an in vitro model of protease assay revealed colchicine (1) and caffeine (2) from chloroform fractions, respectively. Their structures were validated using spectral techniques. The purified compounds were further optimized with Gaussian software utilizing the B3LYP functional and 6-31G(d,p) basis set. The result files were utilized to determine several global reactivity characteristics to explain the diverse behavior of the compounds. Colchicine (1) showed a higher inhibition of protease activity (63.7 +/- 0.5 %age with IC50 = 0.83 +/- 0.07 mM), compared with caffeine (2) (39.2 +/- 1.3 %age). In order to determine the type of inhibition, compound 1 was further studied, and, based on Lineweaver-Burk/Dixon plots and their secondary replots, it was depicted that compound 1 was a non-competitive inhibitor of this enzyme, with a Ki value of 0.690 +/- 0.09 mM. To elucidate the theoretical features of protease inhibition, molecular docking studies were performed against serine protease (PDB #1S0Q), which demonstrated that compound 1 had a strong interaction with the different amino acid residues located on the active site of this understudied enzyme, with a high docking score of 16.2 kcal/mol.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据