Ichthyoplankton metabarcoding: An efficient tool for early detection of invasive species establishment

Detection of invasive species is critical for management but is often limited by challenges associated with capture, processing and identification of early life stages. DNA metabarcoding facilitates large-scale monitoring projects to detect establishment early. Here, we test the use of DNA metabarcoding to monitor invasive species by sequencing over 5000 fishes in bulk ichthyoplankton samples (larvae and eggs) from four rivers of ecological and cultural importance in southern Canada. We were successful in detecting species known from each river and three invasive species in two of the four rivers. This includes the first detection of early life-stage rudd in the Credit River. We evaluated whether sampling gear affected the detection of invasive species and estimates of species richness, and found that light traps outperform bongo nets in both cases. We also found that the primers used for the amplification of target sequences and the number of sequencing reads generated per sample affect the consistency of species detections. However, these factors have less impact on detections and species richness estimates than the number of samples collected and analysed. Our analyses also show that incomplete reference databases can result in incorrectly attributing DNA sequences to invasive species. Overall, we conclude that DNA metabarcoding is an efficient tool for monitoring the early establishment of invasive species by detecting evidence of reproduction but requires careful consideration of sampling design and the primers used to amplify, sequence and classify the diversity of native and potentially invasive species.

Automated summary

Detection of invasive species is critical for management, and DNA metabarcoding can facilitate early detection. In this study, DNA metabarcoding was used to monitor invasive species in southern Canada. The results showed successful detection of known and invasive species, with light traps outperforming bongo nets in sampling gear. However, the choice of primers used and the number of sequencing reads generated per sample had some impact on species detections. Incomplete reference databases also led to incorrect attributions of DNA sequences to invasive species.