4.2 Article

Genotype-Specific Features of Cold-Induced Sweetening Process Regulation in Potato Varieties Nikulinsky, Symfonia, and Nevsky

期刊

MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
卷 57, 期 2, 页码 193-203

出版社

PLEIADES PUBLISHING INC
DOI: 10.1134/S0026893323020061

关键词

Solanum tuberosum L; potato; cold-induced sweetening; regulation; expression; vacuolar invertase; sucrose synthase

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, the expression analysis of genes associated with cold-induced sweetening in potato tubers was performed, including vacuolar invertase, sucrose synthase, and invertase inhibitor. The accumulation of sugars at low temperatures was observed in all three potato varieties, with the highest accumulation of reducing sugars at 4 degrees C. The expression pattern of genes associated with cold-induced sweetening differed depending on the potato variety and storage duration. The involvement of these genes in the process of cold-induced sweetening was discussed.
In this study, we performed expression analysis of genes associated with cold-induced sweetening in potato tubers: vacuolar invertase (Pain-1), sucrose synthase (SUS4), and invertase inhibitor (InvInh2). Potato varieties Nikulinsky, Symfonia, and Nevsky were used. All three varieties were found to accumulate sugars at low temperatures; the maximum accumulation of reducing sugars was observed at 4 degrees C. It was found that the expression pattern of genes associated with cold-induced sweetening differs depending on the variety and storage duration. The increased expression of vacuolar invertase and its inhibitor is more pronounced at the beginning of storage period, whereas the increased expression of sucrose synthase is more pronounced after 3 months of storage. At early storage periods, high expression of invertase and low expression of inhibitor is observed in the Dutch variety Symfonia, and vice versa in the Russian varieties Nikulinsky and Nevsky. The involvement of the studied genes in the process of cold-induced sweetening is discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据