4.7 Article

A selective and sensitive colorimetric method for semi-automated solid-phase extraction of atrazine in environmental water samples

期刊

MICROCHEMICAL JOURNAL
卷 186, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108326

关键词

Atrazine analysis; Colorimetric detection; Konig?s reaction; Solid -phase extraction

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A selective and sensitive method for trace analysis of atrazine in surface water samples was developed using semi-automated solid-phase extraction coupled with a colorimetric method. The method utilized a new coupling agent, p-anisidine, to form a red-colored dye product. The method showed good linearity and low detection and quantification limits, and was validated through spiked samples analysis.
A selective and sensitive procedure for the trace analysis of atrazine (ATZ) in surface water samples was developed using the semi-automated solid-phase extraction (SPE) coupled with a colorimetric method. In this work, we developed Konig's reaction using p-anisidine as a new coupling agent to form a red-colored dye product having lambda max 500 nm and tuned the reaction conditions to occur at 40 degrees C. The possible structure of the orange-red dye product was proposed based on HPLC-UV and UPLC-MS analyses. Under the optimized conditions, the method provided linearity range of 10-30 mu g/L with a good coefficient of determination (R2 > 0.99) in different sample matrices. The limit of detection and limit of quantification were 2.49 and 7.54 mu g/L, respectively. The method validity was evaluated by analyzing the ATZ spiked samples collected from paddy fields, fish farms, and natural canal waters with a recovery range of 104-119 %, and the results were in good agreement with those obtained using HPLC-UV. The developed method was able to reduce the requirement of high heating temperature for the conventional Konig's reaction and was expected to be used for the practical analysis of ATZ at the ppb levels in natural water.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据