4.5 Article

Characterization, estimation of virulence and drug resistance of diarrheagenic escherichia coli (DEC) isolated from Tibetan pigs

期刊

MICROBIAL PATHOGENESIS
卷 177, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2023.106046

关键词

Tibetan pig; Escherichia coli; Virulence; Drug resistance

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, fecal samples of Tibetan piglets from Nyingchi area were analyzed for the presence of Diarrheagenic Escherichia Coli. The isolation rate was found to be 41.3%, with the predominant phylogenetic groups being group A (68.6%) and group B2 (15.7%). The highest detection rates of virulence genes were STb and F107 in E.coli, and fimC and ompA in Tibetan pigs. Drug sensitivity testing revealed high resistance rates to mezlocillin, doxycycline, and gentamicin. This study provides important insights for the prevention and treatment of yellow and white dysentery in Tibetan pigs.
In this study, we collected feces of Tibetan piglets from Nyingchi area for isolation, culture, identification, virulence gene analysis and drug resistance analysis of Escherichia Coli. The results demonstrated a 41.3% isolation rate of Diarrheagenic Escherichia Coli from Tibetan pigs with the main phylogenetic groups: group A (68.6%) and group B2 (15.7%). Typical E.coli accounted for 76.5%. The highest detection rates of porcine virulence genes were E.coli heat-resistant enterotoxin STb (58.82%) and F107 fimbrial subunit (23.53%). The highest detection rates of virulence genes from Tibetan pigs were fimC (80.39%) and ompA (76.47%). A drug sensitivity test showed that Diarrheagenic Escherichia Coli from Tibetan pigs had high drug resistance rates to mezlocillin, doxycycline and gentamicin. This study comprehensively analyzed the species composition, virulence and drug resistance of Diarrheagenic Escherichia Coli from Tibetan pigs, which provided a clearer and more targeted idea for the prevention and treatment of yellow and white dysentery in Tibetan pigs in the future.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据