4.7 Article

Host Species and Environment Shape the Gut Microbiota of Cohabiting Marine Bivalves

期刊

MICROBIAL ECOLOGY
卷 86, 期 3, 页码 1755-1772

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00248-023-02192-z

关键词

Gut microbiota; Seasonal changes; Oysters; Mussels; Aquaculture; Mycoplasma

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pacific oysters and Mediterranean mussels have gut microbiota that plays an important role in their health and nutrition. The composition of their gut microbiota is influenced by both the host and the environment, as revealed by studying their bacterial assemblages in seawater and gut samples.
Pacific oysters (Crassostrea gigas) and Mediterranean mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) are commercially important marine bivalves that frequently coexist and have overlapping feeding ecologies. Like other invertebrates, their gut microbiota is thought to play an important role in supporting their health and nutrition. Yet, little is known regarding the role of the host and environment in driving these communities. Here, bacterial assemblages were surveyed from seawater and gut aspirates of farmed C. gigas and co-occurring wild M. galloprovincialis in summer and winter using Illumina 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Unlike seawater, which was dominated by Pseudomonadata, bivalve samples largely consisted of Mycoplasmatota (Mollicutes) and accounted for >50% of the total OTU abundance. Despite large numbers of common (core) bacterial taxa, bivalve-specific species (OTUs) were also evident and predominantly associated with Mycoplasmataceae (notably Mycoplasma). An increase in diversity (though with varied taxonomic evenness) was observed in winter for both bivalves and was associated with changes in the abundance of core and bivalve-specific taxa, including several representing host-associated and environmental (free-living or particle-diet associated) organisms. Our findings highlight the contribution of the environment and the host in defining the composition of the gut microbiota in cohabiting, intergeneric bivalve populations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据