4.4 Article

Can version of the proximal femur be used for CT planning uncemented femoral stems?

期刊

MEDICAL ENGINEERING & PHYSICS
卷 116, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2023.103985

关键词

Total hip arthroplasty; 3D-CT planning; Prosthetic femoral version; Uncemented; fixation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography planning can predict prosthetic femoral size in un-cemented primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. However, the relationship between Prosthetic Femoral Version and Native Femoral Version is not well understood. This study aimed to assess this relationship using 3D-CT analysis.
Three-Dimensional Computed Tomography (3D-CT) planning can predict the prosthetic femoral size in unce-mented primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA). Correct sizing usually results in optimal varus/valgus femoral alignment; however, its effect on the Prosthetic Femoral Version (PFV) is poorly understood. Most 3D-CT planning systems use Native Femoral Version (NFV) to plan PFV. We aimed to assess the relationship between PFV and NFV in primary uncemented THA using 3D-CT analysis. Pre-and post-operative CT data was retro-spectively collected from 73 patients (81 hips) undergoing primary uncemented THA with a straight-tapered stem. 3D-CT models were used to measure PFV and NFV. The clinical outcomes were evaluated. The discrep-ancy between PFV and NFV was low (<5 degrees) in 43%, moderate (5-10 degrees) in 40%, high (10-15 degrees) in 11% and very high (>15 degrees) in 6% of the cases. We found that NFV is not a useable guide for planning PFV. The 95% limits of agreement were both high at 17 degrees and 15 degrees, respectively. Satisfactory clinical outcomes were recorded. The discrepancy was large enough to recommend against the use of NFV for planning PFV when using straight -tapered uncemented stems. Further work should focus on the internal bony anatomy and the influence of stem design when planning uncemented femoral stems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据