4.5 Article

Comparative study on the low-velocity impact properties of unidirectional flax and carbon fiber reinforced epoxy plates

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/15376494.2023.2179705

关键词

Impact properties; flax fiber reinforced polymer composite; carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite; compression after impact; acoustic emission; damage analysis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article studied the impact resistance of unidirectional flax fiber and carbon fiber reinforced polymer composite plates. Drop hammer impact and compression after impact (CAI) tests were conducted to investigate the impact response, damage resistance, and impact tolerance. Acoustic emission technology was used to study the internal damage. The expansion of matrix cracks caused by the original impact was analyzed under compressive load in fiber-reinforced polymer composites (FRP).
Flax and carbon fibers reinforced polymer composites have high potentials to be used as sustainable building materials. To understand the impact resistance of these fiber composites, the present article studied the impact resistance of unidirectional flax fiber and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (FFRP and CFRP) composite plates. The impact response, damage resistance, and impact tolerance were investigated using drop hammer impact and compression after impact (CAI) tests. The internal damage of FFRP and CFRP due to impact loads was studied using acoustic emission technology. In addition, the development process of impact damage was analyzed. CFRP plates show a higher specific energy absorption rate than that of FFRP, because of the more serious internal damage and brittle fracture tendencies. Matrix cracking was the primary damage in FFRP and CFRP under impact load. Compared with CFRP, FFRP possesses a higher CAI due to less damage. Further expansion of the matrix crack caused by the original impact occurs in the impacted fiber-reinforced polymer composites (FRP) under a compressive load.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据