4.7 Article

Dynamic characteristics of axial load bi-stable energy harvester with piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride film

期刊

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.110065

关键词

Energy harvesting; Bi-stable energy harvester; Piezoelectric film; Axial load; Electromechanical coupling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a nonlinear bi-stable energy harvester with a bulking beam to realize its bi-stable characteristics. The characteristics of the piezoelectric energy harvester are tested under different conditions, revealing different principles at low and high frequencies. The axial load on the harvester is found to greatly influence its vibration amplitude, transitioning from inter-well vibration to intra-well vibration when the axial load changes from 0.4 N to 1.5 N.
In this paper, a nonlinear bi-stable energy harvester with a bulking beam is proposed. Its bi-stable characteristics can be realized by the structure. The characteristics of the piezoelectric energy harvester are tested under different conditions. In the experiment, high speed framing camera is used to capture the details of movement. It is found that similar characteristics occur at low frequency and high frequency, but the principles are not the same. The vibration amplitude is insufficient former when the frequency is low. Under high frequency conditions, the system is hindered by the reverse excitation when the system is about to enter the second steady state due to insufficient response time. In the experiment, the axial load is measured by the length of the buckling beam and the electronic scale. It is found that the axial load has great influence on the vibration amplitude of the harvester. The results show that the harvester changes from inter-well vibration to intra-well vibration when axial load changes from 0.4 N to 1.5 N. The inter-well vibration of the harvester occurs when the acceleration is 3.5 g, the vibration frequency is 15 Hz and the axial load is 0.4 N.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据