4.7 Article

Grain size characterization method of dual-phase titanium alloys with complex microstructure based on laser ultrasonic

期刊

MEASUREMENT
卷 211, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.measurement.2023.112670

关键词

Laser ultrasound; Dual-phase titanium alloy; Complex microstructure; Grain size; Attenuation coefficient

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, samples with different microstructures were obtained by heat treatment, and the attenuation coefficients of ultrasonic waves were calculated based on experimental signals. The relationship between the attenuation coefficient and microstructure was analyzed using metallographic images. Characterization models of the average grain size of dual-phase titanium alloys based on ultrasonic attenuation were established. This study can provide a reference for online detection of grain size of metallic materials with complex microstructure based on laser ultrasonic technology.
The microstructure of dual-phase titanium alloy is more complex than that of single-phase metallic materials, and its mechanical properties have a larger adjustment range. Online detection of the grain size of dual-phase titanium alloys is meaningful for improving product quality and controlling production costs. In this study, samples with different microstructures were obtained by heat treatment. Then, the attenuation coefficients of the ultrasonic wave were calculated by the experimental signals. Combined with metallographic images, the rela-tionship between the attenuation coefficient and microstructure was analyzed. Finally, characterization models of the average grain size of dual-phase titanium alloys based on ultrasonic attenuation were established. In the Rayleigh region, the attenuation coefficient is proportional to the third power of the grain size and the fourth power of the frequency. This study can provide a reference for the online detection of grain size of metallic materials with complex microstructure based on laser ultrasonic technology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据