4.5 Article

Applying a multi-strain dengue model to epidemics data

期刊

MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES
卷 360, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2023.109013

关键词

Epidemics data; Reproduction number; Multi-strain dengue modeling; Numerical simulations

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Dengue disease transmission is complex due to the circulation of four serotypes of the virus. Mathematical models were used to understand the disease complexity. This study extended a previous model to include all four serotypes and estimated parameter values and reproductive numbers for each serotype using epidemic data from Iquitos and San Juan. The results showed that the co-circulation of serotypes had a reduced effect on dengue infection dynamics, with DENV-3 having a smaller impact compared to DENV-4 in Iquitos, and DENV-3 having a reduced impact on DENV-2 and DENV-1 in San Juan.
Dengue disease transmission is a complex vector-borne disease, mainly due to the co-circulation of four serotypes of the virus. Mathematical models have proved to be a useful tool to understand the complexity of this disease. In this work, we extend the model studied by Esteva et al., 2003, originally proposed for two serotypes, to four circulating serotypes. Using epidemic data of dengue fever in Iquitos (Peru) and San Juan (Puerto Rico), we estimate numerically the co-circulation parameter values for selected outbreaks using a bootstrap method, and we also obtained the Basic Reproduction Number, R0, for each serotype, using both analytical calculations and numerical simulations. Our results indicate that the impact of co-circulation of serotypes in population dynamics of dengue infection is such that there is a reduced effect from DENV-3 to DENV-4 in comparison to no-cross effect for epidemics in Iquitos. Concerning San Juan epidemics, also comparing to no-cross effect, we also observed a reduced effect from the predominant serotype DENV-3 to both DENV-2 and DENV-1 epidemics neglecting the very small number of cases of DENV-4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据