4.7 Article

Additive manufacturing of interstitial-strengthened high entropy alloy: Scanning strategy dependent anisotropic mechanical properties

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.msea.2023.144978

关键词

Laser powder-bed fusion; High entropy alloy; Scanning strategy; Heterogeneous microstructure; Mechanical anisotropy

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A non-equiatomic interstitial-strengthened high entropy alloy (iHEA), Fe49.5Mn30Co10Cr10C0.5 (at.%), is manufactured by laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) with stripe and chessboard scanning strategies. The relationship between laser scanning strategies and resulting microstructure, textures, and anisotropic mechanical properties in as-built iHEA is investigated. Results show that LPBF processed iHEA exhibits excellent strength-ductility synergy due to combined deformation mechanisms. The mechanical anisotropy is more evident in samples printed by the stripe scanning strategy compared to the chessboard-scanned samples, attributed to heterogeneous grain morphology and crystallographic texture resulting from different scanning strategies.
A non-equiatomic interstitial-strengthened high entropy alloy (iHEA), Fe49.5Mn30Co10Cr10C0.5 (at.%), is manufactured by laser powder-bed fusion (LPBF) with stripe and chessboard scanning strategies. The present study highlights the correlation between the laser scanning strategies with resulting microstructure, textures, and anisotropic mechanical properties in as-built iHEA. The results show that the LPBF processed iHEA exhibits an excellent strength-ductility synergy due to the combined deformation mechanisms of dislocation slip, martensite phase transformation- and nano twinning-induced plasticity. The samples printed by the stripe scanning strategy show more evident mechanical anisotropy than that of the chessboard-scanned samples. The difference in the degree of mechanical anisotropy is mainly attributed to the heterogeneous grain morphology and crystallographic texture resulted from different scanning strategies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据