4.6 Article

Coactivated cyan emitting phosphors in optical thermometry using thermally and non- thermally coupled levels

期刊

MATERIALS RESEARCH BULLETIN
卷 160, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.112116

关键词

Coactivated phosphors; Tunability; Bistability; Non-lanthanide; Non-thermally coupled levels

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The tunability of upconversion emission was achieved by varying dopant concentration and optimized in the cyan emitting region. Optical bistability was observed in Tm3+/Yb3+: MgWO4 phosphors. The CIE coordinates shifted towards the green region upon Er3+ doping. Decay curve analysis was performed for the developed phosphors. The optical thermometry using the fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR) approach considered the thermally and non-thermally coupled levels of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions in the coactivated MgWO4 phosphors. The addition of Er3+ and Li+ improved the sensitivity of luminescence thermometry in Tm3+/Yb3+: MgWO4 phosphors, with higher sensitivity observed in the non-thermally coupled levels compared to the thermally coupled levels.
The tunability in upconversion (UC) emission has been obtained with varying dopants concentration, visualized with a CIE chromaticity diagram and optimized in the cyan emitting region. The optical bistability has been observed in the Tm3+/Yb3+: MgWO4 phosphors. The CIE coordinates migrated towards the green region after doping Er3+ in the Tm3+/Yb3+: MgWO4 phosphors. The decay curve analysis of the developed phosphors has been performed. Thermally and non-thermally coupled levels of Er3+ and Tm3+ ions in the coactivated MgWO4 phosphors have been considered in the optical thermometry using the fluorescence intensity ratio (FIR) approach. The addition of Er3+ and Li+ in Tm3+/Yb3+: MgWO4 phosphors improves the sensitivity of luminescence thermometry. The absolute and relative sensitivity in the non-thermally coupled levels is found maximum as compared to the system containing thermally coupled levels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据