4.6 Article

The research on photocatalytic oxygen evolution of Bi4Ti3O12 microsphere by different Ag-loading content

期刊

MATERIALS LETTERS
卷 341, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.134219

关键词

Ag/Bi4Ti3O12; Nanocomposites; Photocatalysis; Oxidation; Water splitting

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, Ag/Bi4Ti3O12 (Ag/BTO) nanocomposites with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect were synthesized by a solvothermal method. Compared with BTO, Ag/BTO narrowed the band gap, improved the absorption intensity in the 400-700 nm region, increased the separation efficiency of photo-induced electron-hole pairs, reduced the energy barrier of the key step from water splitting, and remarkably enhanced the photocatalytic water oxidation ability. The oxygen evolution rate of visible-light-driven 3-Ag/BTO with an appropriate silver content is 8.39 times higher than that of BTO without any sacrificial agent, and the performance of 3-Ag/BTO is also higher than that of most reported photocatalysts.
The search of catalysts with high efficiency for photocatalytic oxygen evolution by water splitting has always attracted great attention of global scientists. In this study, Ag/Bi4Ti3O12 (Ag/BTO) nanocomposites with surface plasmon resonance (SPR) effect were synthesized by a solvothermal method. Compared with BTO, Ag/BTO narrowed the band gap, improved the absorption intensity in 400-700 nm region, increased the separation efficiency of photo-induced electron-hole pairs, reduced the energy barrier (from 2.18 to 1.39 eV) of the key step (O* -> OOH*) from water splitting, and remarkably enhanced the photocatalytic water oxidation ability. The oxygen evolution rate of visible-light-driven 3-Ag/BTO with an appropriate silver content is 2623.51 mu mol center dot g(-1) center dot h(-1), which is 8.39 times higher than that of BTO without any sacrificial agent. Moreover, the excellent performance of 3-Ag/BTO is also obviously higher than that of most reported photocatalysts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据