4.7 Article

Preparation of cellulose acetate film with dual hydrophobic-hydrophilic properties using solution blow spinning

期刊

MATERIALS & DESIGN
卷 227, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.111788

关键词

Solution blow spinning; Cellulose acetate; Double-layered film; Dual wettability

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, cellulose acetate materials were prepared using the SBS method, and the solvent system and SBS processing parameters were used to control the thermal properties, crystallinity, and morphology of the materials. The roughness and porosity of the materials influenced the contact angle, and a double-layered film with dual wettability was obtained.
Solution blow spinning (SBS), a processing method alternative to electrospinning, where pressured air is used instead of an electric field, was used in this work for the preparation of cellulose acetate (CA) materials. The sequential use of SBS to produce a double-layered film is also investigated. Mixtures of acetone with acetic acid or N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF) were studied as systems for polymer solution preparation. The type of produced material (flat film or multi-structured membranes constituted from submicrometric fibers with beads), its thermal properties, crystallinity, and morphology are more dependent on the solvent system than other SBS processing parameters. Roughness and porosity of differently produced materials influence wettability measured by the contact angle, which ranges in this work from approx. 69.8 & DEG; & PLUSMN; 3 & DEG; for a flat film to 104 & DEG; & PLUSMN; 5 & DEG; for fibrous material. Finally, a double-layered film, prepared by sequential SBS of individual layers different in terms of wettability, renders a standalone film of dual wettability, with one side hydrophobic and the other hydrophilic. & COPY; 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据