4.7 Article

In Vitro and In Silico Evaluation of Red Algae Laurencia obtusa Anticancer Activity

期刊

MARINE DRUGS
卷 21, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/md21060318

关键词

Laurencia; seaweed; gastric cancer; molecular docking

向作者/读者索取更多资源

It is estimated that there will be nearly 2 million new cases of gastric cancer worldwide in the next two decades, leading to an increased demand for new treatments. Marine algae, such as Laurencia genus, have been found to contain cytotoxic compounds like terpenes and acetogenins. This study identified and tested the cytotoxicity of compounds from Laurencia obtusa, demonstrating their potential for treating gastric adenocarcinoma.
Studies estimate that nearly 2 million new cases of gastric cancer will occur worldwide during the next two decades, which will increase mortality associated with cancer and the demand for new treatments. Marine algae of the Laurencia genus have secondary metabolites known for their cytotoxic action, such as terpenes and acetogenins. The species Laurencia obtusa has demonstrated cytotoxicity against many types of tumors in previous analyses. In this study, we determined the structure of terpenes, acetogenins, and one fatty acid of Laurencia using mass spectrometry (ESI-FT-ICR/MS). In vitro cytotoxicity assays were performed with adenocarcinoma gastric cells (AGS) to select the most cytotoxic fraction of the crude extract of L. obtusa. The Hex:AcOEt fraction was the most cytotoxic, with IC50 9.23 & mu;g/mL. The selectivity index of 15.56 shows that the Hex:AcOEt fraction is selective to cancer cells. Compounds obtained from L. obtusa were tested by the analysis of crystallographic complexes. Molecular docking calculations on the active site of the HIF-2 & alpha; protein showed the highest affinity for sesquiterpene chermesiterpenoid B, identified from HEX:AcOEt fraction, reaching a score of 65.9. The results indicate that L. obtusa presents potential compounds to be used in the treatment of neoplasms, such as gastric adenocarcinoma.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据