4.1 Article

Alkylaluminum/Urea Hybrid Cocatalysts and Their Use in Iron-Catalyzed Oligomerization of Ethylene

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/mren.202300013

关键词

alkylaluminums; bis(imino)pyridyl iron catalysts; cocatalysts; ethylene oligomerization; linear alpha-olefins; urea

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, new cocatalysts are prepared by reacting alkylaluminums with urea and its derivatives, which can effectively activate iron-based catalysts. The type and molar ratio of alkylaluminum and urea have a significant influence on the performance of the cocatalysts. The catalytic system exhibits good high temperature stability and can maintain high activity at elevated temperatures.
The bis(imino)pyridyl iron-based ethylene oligomerization catalysts have the advantages of mild reaction conditions, high activity and high selectivity to linear a-olefins. However, barriers, such as high polymer content in the product mixture and large methylaluminoxane (MAO) dosage, are still limitations for the development of these systems at the industrial scale. In this study, new cocatalysts are prepared by the reaction of alkylaluminums with urea and its derivatives, and successfully used to activate iron-based catalysts. It is found that the type and molar ratio of alkylaluminum and urea have significant influence on the performance of the cocatalysts. The activity of the preferred triisobutylaluminum/urea activated systems reaches more than 3.0 x 10(8) g (mol-Fe)(-1) h(-1), and the polymer content can be controlled to be less than 2 wt.%. Notably, the catalytic system exhibits good high temperature stability, the activity can still reach 1.0 x 10(8) g (mol-Fe)(-1) h(-1) even at 120 degrees C. Further H-1 NMR studies show that alkylaluminum can react with the N-H moieties of urea, forming complex alkylaluminum clusters, even aluminoxane-like structures. This study offers a promising family of cocatalysts, making it possible to simultaneously improve their performance and reduce their cost.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据