4.7 Article

Surface-Initiated Synthesis of Cell-Specific Glycopolymers Using Live Mammalian Cells as Templates

期刊

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/marc.202200881

关键词

cell specificity; cell-sugar monomer-aptation-polymerization (CS-MAP); Cu-RDRP; glycopolymers; live cell templates

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, a novel, versatile, and effective method was developed to obtain cell-specific glycosurfaces by surface-initiated Cu-mediated reversible deactivation radical polymerization in an open to air fashion. Mammalian cells were used as live templates to produce cell-specific glycosurfaces, which could distinguish template cells from others. The strategy was effective and convenient without the need for fixative pretreatment of cells.
Molecular recognition is an important process in life activities where specificity is the key. However, the method to gain specificity are often complex and time-consuming. Herein, a novel, versatile, and effective way is developed to obtain cell-specific glycosurfaces by surface-initiated Cu-mediated reversible deactivation radical polymerization (Cu-RDRP) in an open to air fashion. Mammalian cells are used for the first time as live templates to realize cell-sugar monomer-aptation-polymerization which can produce cell-specific glycosurfaces. Both epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) positive cells L929 and EpCAM negative cells Hela as models are used to acquire two cell-specific glycosurfaces, which can distinguish template-cells from others. The strategy is effective and convenient without the need of fixative pretreatment of cells. It is found that the specific capture does not rely on EpCAM antibodies, and the specificity is related to the composition and chain sequence of the glycopolymer brushes rather than surface morphology. In addition, these glycosurfaces keep the ability to identify the target cells after ten regenerative treatments, which provides another advantage for practical applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据