4.4 Article

Local Chain Dynamics in Polyelectrolyte Multilayers of Chitosan and Spin-Labeled Poly(ethylene-alt-maleic acid)

期刊

MACROMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 224, 期 10, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/macp.202300017

关键词

dynamics; EPR spectroscopy; polyelectrolyte multilayers; simulation; spin-labeling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study utilizes cationic charged chitosan and weak polyacid poly(ethylene-alt-maleic acid) to create polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs). By attaching a nitroxide spin-label to the polyacid, the rotational dynamics of the polymer backbone in the swollen state of the PEMs are studied using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy. The study reveals that PEMs with an even number of layers exhibit a superposition of two spectral components, a major slow-motion component from protonated amino groups compensating chain segments of the chitosan, and a minor fast-motion component believed to originate from loops and tails of the polyacid chain at the PEMs' surface.
The cationic charged chitosan and the weak polyacid poly(ethylene-alt-maleic acid) are used to build polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs). To study the rotational dynamics of the polymer backbone in the swollen state of the PEMs using electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, a nitroxide spin-label is covalently attached to the polyacid. It is found that spectra of PEMs with even number of layers show a superposition of two spectral components: a major, slow-motion component, which arises from chain segments intrinsically compensated by protonated amino groups of the chitosan, and a minor, fast-motion component, which is assumed to originate from loops and tails of the polyacid chain located at the surface of the PEMs. The dissociated acid groups in the loops and tails are extrinsically compensated by small counterions and the rotational mobility of these chain segments is consequently much higher compared to chain segments interacting with the oppositely charged chitosan.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据