4.7 Article

ProtoSimi: label correction for fine-grained visual categorization

期刊

MACHINE LEARNING
卷 -, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10994-023-06313-0

关键词

Label noise; Fine-grained visual categorization; Deep learning

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a learning framework named ProtoSimi to improve the robustness of deep models in noisy data for fine-grained image classification. The method employs an adaptive label correction strategy and considers both global class-prototype and part class-prototype similarities to identify and correct sample labels. Experimental results show that the method outperforms existing label noisy methods.
Deep models trained by using clean data have achieved tremendous success in fine-grained image classification. Yet, they generally suffer from significant performance degradation when encountering noisy labels. Existing approaches to handle label noise, though proved to be effective for generic object recognition, usually fail on fine-grained data. The reason is that, on fine-grained data, the category difference is subtle and the training sample size is small. Then deep models could easily overfit the noisy labels. To improve the robustness of deep models on noisy data for fine-grained visual categorization, in this paper, we propose a novel learning framework named ProtoSimi. Our method employs an adaptive label correction strategy, ensuring effective learning on limited data. Specifically, our approach considers the criteria of exploring the effectiveness of both global class-prototype and part class-prototype similarities in identifying and correcting labels of samples. We evaluate our method on three standard benchmarks of fine-grained recognition. Experimental results show that our method outperforms the existing label noisy methods by a large margin. In ablation studies, we also verify that our method is non-sensitive to hyper-parameters selection and can be integrated with other FGVC methods to increase the generalization performance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据