4.7 Article

A novel chimeric endolysin with enhanced lytic and binding activity against Clostridium perfringens

期刊

LWT-FOOD SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 181, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2023.114776

关键词

Clostridium perfringens; Bacteriophage; Endolysin; Domain shuffling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clostridium perfringens is a bacterium that causes diseases in humans and livestock. Antibiotic resistance is a growing concern, necessitating the search for alternative biocontrol agents. In this study, a C. perfringens-infecting bacteriophage and its endolysin were isolated and characterized. Through domain shuffling, a chimeric endolysin was generated with higher antimicrobial activity than the parental endolysin.
Clostridium perfringens is a gram-positive, anaerobic, and spore-forming bacterium that produces toxins causing various diseases in humans and livestock animals. With the growth in antibiotic resistance, finding alternative biocontrol agents against C. perfringens is necessary for food safety and animal health. Here, we isolated a C. perfringens-infecting bacteriophage CPD9 and characterized its endolysin LysCPD9. Although LysCPD9 has specific lytic activity against C. perfringens over a wide range of environmental conditions, its activity was lower than expected. To improve its lytic activity, we generated chimeric endolysins by shuffling the domains of LysCPD9 with those of thermostable C. perfringens endolysin, LysCPS2. Among the chimeras, a novel chimeric endolysin, ClyY, showed higher antimicrobial activity than its parental endolysin LysCPD9. In addition, ClyY significantly reduced C. perfringens cells in artificially contaminated milk and beef by 4-log CFU/ml and 3-log CFU/cm2, respectively, within 2 h. This enhanced lytic activity might be due to the increased cell wall binding because ClyY showed at least 3-fold higher binding activity than LysCPD9. ClyY could be utilized as an effective therapeutic as well as diagnostic tool for C. perfringens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据