4.7 Article

Pharmacologic targeting of Nedd8-activating enzyme reinvigorates T-cell responses in lymphoid neoplasia

期刊

LEUKEMIA
卷 37, 期 6, 页码 1324-1335

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41375-023-01889-x

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrates that the drug pevonedistat, which targets Neddylation, directly affects CD8(+) T cells and enhances their cytotoxicity and anti-tumor activity. It also stimulates an inflammatory response in the T cells, leading to inhibited tumor growth.
Neddylation is a sequential enzyme-based process which regulates the function of E3 Cullin-RING ligase (CRL) and thus degradation of substrate proteins. Here we show that CD8(+) T cells are a direct target for therapeutically relevant anti-lymphoma activity of pevonedistat, a Nedd8-activating enzyme (NAE) inhibitor. Pevonedistat-treated patient-derived CD8(+) T cells upregulated TNF alpha and IFN gamma and exhibited enhanced cytotoxicity. Pevonedistat induced CD8(+) T-cell inflamed microenvironment and delayed tumor progression in A20 syngeneic lymphoma model. This anti-tumor effect lessened when CD8(+) T cells lost the ability to engage tumors through MHC class I interactions, achieved either through CD8(+) T-cell depletion or genetic knockout of B2M. Meanwhile, loss of UBE2M in tumor did not alter efficacy of pevonedistat. Concurrent blockade of NAE and PD-1 led to enhanced tumor immune infiltration, T-cell activation and chemokine expression and synergistically restricted tumor growth. shRNA-mediated knockdown of HIF-1 alpha, a CRL substrate, abrogated the in vitro effects of pevonedistat, suggesting that NAE inhibition modulates T-cell function in HIF-1 alpha-dependent manner. scRNA-Seq-based clinical analyses in lymphoma patients receiving pevonedistat therapy demonstrated upregulation of interferon response signatures in immune cells. Thus, targeting NAE enhances the inflammatory T-cell state, providing rationale for checkpoint blockade-based combination therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据